We are watching, in real time, what happens when leaders operate with only one value.

The dominant story of success right now treats values and integrity as something you talk about at retreats and ignore when the money is on the table. It celebrates a particular pattern of leadership that isn’t operating without values — it’s operating with one. Win. Or accumulate. Or dominate. Or be seen as right. That single value runs them — and the cost of that narrowness is being paid by the people in their orbit.

The cultural story is that this is what winning looks like. I don’t think it is. I think it’s what winning looks like when no one has bothered to ask what was traded for it and who pays the price.

I think we deserve more from our leaders today.

Consider the patterns. The leader who eliminates 20% of the workforce to meet stockholder expectations. No growth ideas coupled with impetuous execution. The output looks decisive. The cost is paid by the people who absorbed the chaos, the talent that walked out the door, the projects that died because no one knew the history. The leader whose corporate behavior is mirrored at home. Children estranged. Partners managed with money rather than presence. The high-performing salesperson promoted to lead the team, only to discover they have no idea how to lead anyone but themselves. The executive who ignites fear simply by walking into the room. The pattern at scale is the pattern at the dinner table. One value running everything.

This is what failed integrity looks like. Not the dramatic kind — the cheating spouse, the embezzler. Something quieter. Leaders whose one operating value has crowded out everything else, who are no longer accountable to the people their decisions affect, who have stopped asking what they owe beyond the win. And here is what makes the pattern so durable: from inside, the one-value leader doesn’t experience anything as wrong. They are winning by their measure. The cost is being borne by people they don’t experience as their responsibility — and that distance is, structurally, the failure. Integrity isn’t a single act of honesty. It’s the discipline of staying accountable to more than your dominant aim, including to the people your decisions affect who don’t share your view of the win. The leaders winning loudest right now are often the ones who have abandoned that discipline most completely.

And here is the harder observation. Being extraordinarily good at one thing — making money, building products, executing fast — is not the same as being good at leading. Sometimes the market rewards the narrow excellence early. The reward doesn’t build the values that long-term leadership requires. Some of the loudest current examples of one-value leadership are people whose extraordinary capability has let them avoid the rest of the work. The capability does all the visible work, until something arrives that the capability can’t fix — a team that won’t follow, a family that disconnects, a moment that exposes the gap — and the underlying architecture turns out to be empty.

Compare that to a leader operating with values and integrity that reach further. The expansive leader carries a set of values that produce wider good. They build environments where other people can also succeed. They invest time and resources in the people contributing to what gets made. They value the contribution alongside the contributor. They encourage the people around them to live with stronger values rather than narrower ones. The environments they create feel safe, and trust gets built inside them. Their positive impact reaches well beyond themselves — and what gets built is sustainable, strong, and worth living inside. The narrow-value leader produces wreckage and calls it disruption. The expansive leader produces value and lets it compound.

There is a concrete recent example worth sitting with. When the Artemis II astronauts named their Orion spacecraft, the name they chose was Integrity. They selected it to honor the trust, respect, candor, and humility shared among the global teams and engineers who brought the mission to life. The name also stood for the integrated effort to combine more than 300,000 spacecraft components into one vehicle that would hold under conditions that punish every weak point. The mission captivated millions of people who would never sit in that spacecraft — and that itself is the point. Integrity at that scale is not a virtue. It is an architecture. Every component has to hold for the whole to hold. The trust and care it took to build it reached well beyond the build itself. That is true of a spacecraft. It is also true of leadership and life.

If you have read this far, this piece is for you. It is for the builder who wants to build something different than what is being held up culturally as success. It is for the leader who is being pulled toward a model that doesn’t sit right, who is conforming to some degree, and who is looking for something more honest to work from. It is for the reader who has already noticed what one-value leadership produces, and is asking whether there is another way to lead.

There is. And the place to start is here.

Values and Integrity, Together

Values are the personal principles you prioritize — what you have decided matters most. Honesty. Family. Excellence. Service. Whatever is on your list.

Integrity is the active commitment to live by them — doing the right thing even when no one is watching, holding the line even when something tries to push you off.

Simply put: values are what you stand for. Integrity is how you stand for them.

The two are not separate. They are always supporting each other. A value you name but never live by has not been honored. Integrity without underlying values has nothing to be in service of. The work, for any builder who wants to build differently, is to make both real — to know what you actually stand for, and to live by those things consistently enough to call it integrity.

Operating Values vs. Aspirational Values

Most of what people put on their values list is aspirational. Things they want to hold. Things they admire. Things that sounded right in a retreat or a coaching session or a personal mission statement.

Not the things they actually defend when something is on the line.

The distinction I draw is between operating values and aspirational values.

Operating values are the values you actually run on. They show up in your actions. They are visible in how you spend money, how you spend time, who gets your attention, what you say yes to under pressure, and what you say no to without thinking.

Aspirational values are the values you want to run on. They show up in your language, your branding, your team off-sites, your personal essays.

When your stated values and your operating values don’t match, your nervous system knows it before your mind does. You feel low-grade incoherence. You wonder why something feels off when nothing visible is wrong. You start questioning things that aren’t actually the problem. The problem is the gap between what you’ve said you stand for and what you actually decide for.

That gap is expensive. Your team feels it even when they can’t name it. Your family experiences the version of you that operates rather than the version that aspires. And you carry the fatigue of pretending — which is its own quiet cost.

You don’t have a value the way you have a credential or a job title. You live it. Repeatedly. Under cost. A value becomes operating not through declaration but through accumulated practice — the number of times you’ve held it when the moment asked you to choose. Integrity works the same way. You don’t have it or not have it. You live in it. Some days closer, some days farther. Pressure pushes you out. Miscalculation pushes you out. The expectation isn’t to never drift. The work is to recognize when you’ve drifted and find your way back.

The Two-Question Test

There’s a quiet diagnostic that separates leaders who actually live their values from leaders who think they do.

It is not a personality assessment. A values exercise can help you name what you want to hold; that is necessary work, and for many people it is where the values conversation has to start. The diagnostic below is something different. It is how you find out which of the values you have named are actually operating — and which are still aspirational.

It is simpler than any exercise. And it tends to produce more discomfort than people expect.

The diagnostic has two questions.

Question one. When this value cost you something significant in the last six months, did you still hold it? 

If you can name the cost — the deal you turned down, the relationship you slowed, the path you chose against your interest, the night you went home instead of staying — it’s an operating value. The cost is the proof of the value.

If you can’t name a cost in the last six months, it’s probably aspirational. You may want it to be a value. It’s not yet.

Question two. Do the people closest to you experience this as a value of yours?

Not “could they articulate it.” That’s a different question. The real test is — would they be surprised to hear you list this as one of your values, or would they nod and say “obviously”?

The values your closest people would describe you by — those are your operating values, regardless of what you’d write on a piece of paper. The values they wouldn’t recognize are your aspirational ones.

You can apply the questions to any value you’d put on a list. Integrity. Family. Health. Excellence. Innovation. Service. Whatever’s on yours.

What you’ll usually find is that some of the values on your list pass both questions cleanly. They’re operating values. You can stop worrying about them and start trusting them.

Some pass one question and not the other. Those are the gaps. Either you hold the value but the people around you don’t see it (the value isn’t demonstrated consistently), or the people around you see it but you can’t name what it’s cost you (the value is performative, not operational).

And some don’t pass either question. Those are aspirational. They aren’t yours yet. They might be someday. They aren’t now.

The Work

The work is not to decide which aspirational values to keep aspiring to. The work is to be honest about which ones are which.

Honesty is the entire move.

A leader with three real operating values is more powerful than a leader with ten aspirational ones. Because the three actually decide things. They actually filter. They actually produce action under pressure. The ten produce a story.

A real values list is short. It’s earned. It’s been tested in the last six months and is still standing.

You don’t need to live up to a longer list. You need to know which list is real — and then keep the rails honest, because the larger work this serves is the work of living in integrity.

That is how a builder builds something they can live inside. Not by winning the way everyone else is winning. By honoring what matters most and staying in alignment with it while building. The wider the values, the wider what gets built.

And the rest of the world is starting to see it. People are tired of leaders who treat workers as expenses, families as logistics, communities as backdrops. People want more — for themselves, and for the people around them. The builders who are quietly doing this work are the ones who will lead what comes next.

Next week, the integrity piece — what it means to live in integrity, drift out of it, and find your way back.

•         •        •

If you want a starting point for the questions that surface what you’ve actually been living by, there’s a short list I put together called The Questions That Builders Stop Asking. It’s free, and it’s designed for exactly this kind of honest sitting-with. The link is on my profile.

— Cheryl